For trademark attorneys
RE:ACTION pulls the application file from TSDR, reads the examiner's letter, gathers register evidence, and hands you a filing-shaped draft response as a Word document — every refusal named, ready for your review.
Attorney work aid, not legal advice. Every draft carries a review banner.
Mark: RE:ACTION · Serial No. 99252648
Office Action of Dec 4, 2025
Applicant responds to the requirement to amend the identification of services. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Applicant accepts the examining attorney's proposed identification and adopts the suggested wording set forth in the Office Action, completing the function-and-purpose specifications the examining attorney left for Applicant to supply, as set forth below.
Consistent with TMEP §1402.09 and Camloc Fastener Corp. v. Grant, 119 USPQ 264, 264 n.1 (TTAB 1958), the amended identification deletes the registered wording "United States Patent and Trademark Office" (U.S. Registration Nos. 6832042 and 6832052) from each entry in which it appeared and substitutes the descriptive wording supplied by the examining attorney: "the federal agency in the United States responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks." Applicant notes that one "Software as a service (SAAS)" entry in the suggested identification, as printed in the Office Action, retained the registered wording; because the requirement directs deletion of that wording wherever it appears in the identification, Applicant has applied the examining attorney's same substitute descriptive wording uniformly to that entry as well.
Read the whole draft →.docx, measured 2026-08-24What happens between typing eight digits and opening the draft in Word.
Nothing to upload. The application, the prosecution history and the Office Action are public, and RE:ACTION pulls them straight from TSDR — the same file you'd open yourself.
Every refusal and requirement gets named — 2(d), 2(e)(1), disclaimers, identification amendments, specimen issues, the advisories at the bottom. A rule-based reader goes first; an LLM cross-check reads the letter again so anything the rules missed is still surfaced, never silently dropped.
For a 2(d) refusal, it searches the live register for third-party registrations sharing the cited wording, scores them for relatedness to the goods, and attaches them as Exhibit A. It also checks whether each cited registration is still alive on the register — a cancelled citation is the shortest argument there is, and the draft leads with it.
HOOKED FOR LIFE — 12 third-party registrations gathered for a Class 25 refusal.
Filing-shaped sections with the authority cited, in the register of a TEAS response. Where the record leaves a fact to the applicant — years of use, sales, a substitute specimen — the draft leaves a bracketed placeholder for you to fill rather than guessing. You edit, you file.
Scope
RE:ACTION drafts the refusals that make up most of the work and says so plainly when it can't. A wrong argument in front of you costs more than an honest "not yet."
The issue is named, the standard options are listed, and the draft states outright that drafting for it isn't automated.
Who it's for
You take Office Actions on flat fees and do the work yourself. The response is the billable unit; the hours hide in the issue-spotting and the exhibit hunt. RE:ACTION is built to give those hours back — and to leave the judgment calls where they belong, with you.
The demo
Precomputed walkthroughs on real Office Actions — RE:ACTION's own application and eight others since resolved. Every draft is downloadable as it was generated.
Tell us about your practice and how many Office Actions cross your desk in a month. We'll reply from a person.
Request accesssupport@reaction-ai.com